Let me be the first to say: I am pro-sunlight. I’m not talking about weather patterns, either. I’m talking about exposing yourself to some rays. I commit a fair amount of time outdoors soaking up the sun’s energy (of course, getting careful not to burn). While evidently most dermatologists think we would be superior off spelunking in caves 24/7 and covering ourselves in head-to-toe black garb whenever we venture out, my own evolutionary perspective leads me to think we were developed to get sunlight nearly every day and that our health suffers if we don’t get adequate.
In fact, recent studies show that, as a outcome of our shunning the sun, many of us suffer from Vitamin D deficiency and a resulting loss of bone density and immune function (to name just a handful of effects). Some researchers opine that much more persons die from lack of sun than from too much sun! But, I digress.
I came across an short article the other day that piqued my curiosity given that it dealt with the mixture of operating and sunning. It generally showed that marathoners (e.g. formerly yours truly) have a tendency to get skin cancer at greater prices than other folks. The more they run, the greater the incidence of National Tree Co. skin cancer.
My take on what’s happening is that not only are runners exposed to more sun (which can result in DNA damage in skin cells – ergo, cancer), but they are also bathed in more absolutely free-radicals all round from the excessive oxidation of glucose and fats.
We know that sun exposure does deplete the skin of the antioxidant Vitamin C. Stick with me on this: the act of running tends to divert blood flow away from the skin, starving it of added essential antioxidants that could neutralize the totally free-radical harm in the skin tissues. Add to that the massive amounts of stressful cortisol marathoners pump out doing this unnaturally higher steady-state oxidative function and National Tree Co. we not only get the DNA harm, we get the immune-bashing effects of the high-strain activity. The effect: far more DNA harm and a reduced ability to recognize that harm and take steps to do away with National Tree Co. those National Tree Co. cells and/or repair the damage.
That’s one reason (amongst lots of) that I have doused myself with antioxidants inside and out for over 20 years now. That’s also why one of my mantras is: a small running is OK National Tree Co. – a lot is terrible.
The above post patriotic hydrangea garland also brings up other points of discussion, such as no matter if the reliance on inferior sunscreens could possibly be one more cause. This is vitally essential to go over and it’s not having a great deal focus in the mainstream media. It appears that for the previous 30 years so-called sunscreens have been superior at blocking UVB rays (the ones that burn) but not UVA (the ones primarily responsible for DNA harm and skin cancer). Thank you, FDA. The terrible effect is a generation of gung-ho well being fanatics slathering on sunscreen and operating 40, 50 or 100 miles a week. The reality that we didn’t burn only lead us to believe we could keep out even longer. Small did National Tree Co. we know that the burning of skin may well have been a great first warning to get the hell out of the sun! How’s that for nature’s way of saying “Yo! Adequate!”? Unfortunately, the sunscreen gave us the false notion we have been invulnerable. Oops. Guess significant Pharma was wrong once again. Far more on that later….
[tags] sunscreen, vitamin D, totally free radicals, marathon, antioxidants, DNA damage, skin cancer, UVA, UVB, cortisol, sun block, National Tree Co. SPF, immunity, bone density, osteoporosis, dermatology [/tags]